Resilient leadership?
On Thursday 28 August 2008 at The City Recital Hall in Sydney, I paid my $35 and went to “hear it from the Boss” – at AFR Boss Magazine’s annual public event – Resilient Leadership. The ad sold me on the idea of joining “the Boss panel of business leaders in a stimulating discussion of what makes a great leader for today’s turbulent times.” Well, this sounded just my thing, so I went along to listen and perhaps line up to ask a question.
And it was an esteemed panel. Breakfast announcer and brain on two legs - Adam Spencer. Commonwealth Bank Director and the former CEO who led the turnaround of AMP – Andrew Mohl. Australian CEO of National Australia Bank - Ahmed Fahour, responsible for some of that organisation’s turnaround. Patrick Grier - Board Member & former CEO of Ramsay Health Care and responsible for their turnaround story. Elizabeth Ann Macgregor, CEO of Museum of Contemporary Art, Sydney - responsible for turning that organisation around from the brink. And to give us a feel for what people think about, Ipsos’ Australia Research Director Dr Rebecca Huntley. A very esteemed panel indeed.
And the panel was very generous with sharing their stories, their insights and a lot of wisdom. Indeed it was $35 well spent.
As I listened to the stories of this panel, we heard great stories, stories about leadership and culture, bringing things back from the brink, tenacity, personal determination. Great stuff.
But no event seems complete for me these days unless I’ve tried to spot an elephant in the room. This one’s easy. Have a look at the panel’s bios above and see if you can see anything in common… that’s right, these are all turnaround stories, wonderful, triumphant turnaround stories, rallying around an organisation in crisis.
Here’s a rough transcript of what happened next:
Davies (from the floor): We’ve heard resilience defined tonight a bit like an elastic band, which stretches and bounces back. And all of the case studies we’ve heard tonight have talked about triumphing in the face of adversity, rallying around a cause or burning platform. So the inference I guess is that we need something to rally around. I guess that my question is, what do you do with an event which could cause the elastic to stretch so much that it snaps? And as we face creeping issues like climate change, or oil, or whatever, how do we make sure we don’t snap our elastic, so that we’re truly resilient?
Spencer: So in times of true crisis, when things really go wrong, how do we do it?
Panel: Pregnant Pause
Spencer: [cheekily jeering] Anyone who wants it…
Audience: Burst of laughter
Panel: …
Well it’s the AFR’s event so it would be unfair of me to give the punch line. Narelle and the team at Boss have promised video of the event on their site and I’m sure they’ll do a great job. I’m looking forward to seeing their take on things.
But in a nutshell the response from the panel was that changes in external environment pose real challenges which are difficult. And they are challenges… And they are difficult… Followed by a quick save by Adam asking NAB’s new CEO to share what goes through your head as a leader when an event like 9/11 happens.
At the end of the session a number of people came up to me and said that it was a good question and what a shame it was that no-one answered it, to which I did confess that it was a bit of an unfair question considering the head start that the Resilient Futures team has on the subject.
But perhaps that was being too kind. It is a real question, and one that has been on my mind since the Resilient WA campaign (a Western Australian Resilient Futures Network campaign that focused on water and climate change - two very important subjects for WA - with the purpose of creating catalytic action to expand the network in WA).
When analysing the conditions in addressing the issues related to water security and climate change in WA, someone on my table pointed out a key condition related to the problem. “We have never had level 4 water restrictions here. No one is aware that we’ve got a problem. There’s no urgency. There’s no call to action.”
I thought back to how many people in the risk profession had confidentially told me that they had either been thankful for a “near miss” to get their organisation focused on risk management, or sat frustrated in a complacent organisation, almost hopeful for a near miss to break the organisation out of its current hubris.
So the question is real. If organisations and people only respond well to “near misses” or cleaning up from near disasters, are we being resilient? Or just tenacious? How do we wake people up to emerging conditions that require proactive adaptation? How do we break away from hubris and complacency? Who’s going to create the catalytic action to get things started?
These are questions which we work through every day at the RFN at different levels, and we’re very interested in your thoughts. Please share.
***
Post-script 1: On a lighter note, I asked Adam Spencer after the show whether he had any tips as ‘Australia’s most resilient MC’. He shared with me that his technique is to have enormous amounts of material at your disposal in case your interviewees clam up, but to only fall back on this if required. With the confidence of this fallback position, he is then very comfortable to ad-lib, go with the flow and avoid the predictable script entirely. We joked that “It takes hours of rehearsal to be spontaneous.” But in this small statement, Adam pointed out a number of key attributes of our resilience model – redundancy and fallback, creativity, willingness to jettison redundant material, ebbing and flowing with conditions, and prospering though this process. Adam – thanks for the metaphor and living example!
***
Todd Davies is our theme leader on risk, governance and assurance and aims to provoke and challenge prevailing thinking in these areas. He is a bit obsessed with emerging risk at the moment which means he has an annoying habit of asking difficult questions at public events. Todd’s comments are his own and not necessarily those of the RF Network. For more of his work, please click here.
Related posts
If you enjoyed this post, make sure you pass it on and subscribe to our free RSS feed!

September 9th, 2008 at 1:55 pm
Hmph - that’s funny! I’m thankful for the Resilient WA compaign for teaching me to be able to think… and maybe one day too be able to ask difficult questions at public events. Looking forward to seeing the AFR’s video (not up on their site yet). Also - will there be anything else put on the Resilient Futures site from the WA campaign?
September 22nd, 2008 at 3:23 pm
Great stuff Sally. That’s what its all about. And don’t forget the great work that your project - Adapative CentreCare. Creating a resilient organization takes a high level of leader capability - both in you, and those that support this challenge.
Re the WA campaign videos - we will soon have up on the site the videos for all to see.
October 5th, 2008 at 7:18 pm
The video grabs from the AFR’s Resilient Leadership event are now available. Reflecting back on the event, the video really emphasises to me that each case study was a turnaround story where the CEO had a burning platform for change. In other words, the looming problem had hit, and a new CEO had to be brought in to clean up the mess.
In my mind it really begs the question on how to mobilise people on emerging risks BEFORE they hit rather than afterwards.
RFN would argue that an important first step is for leaders, stewards and individuals to have a good understanding of emerging conditions. (I would argue that without this then leaders are actually being reckless - http://www.resilientfutures.org/2008/05/are-you-being-a-reckless-leader-without-realising-it/).
Secondly people need a model that allows them to act, rather than go into denial, complacency, or shock. We’re working hard on both of those enablers through Larry’s work with the RFN process.
The video of AFR’s event can be found here: http://tv.afr.com/index.php?videoID=3567
And the transcript can be found here: http://www.afrboss.com.au/events/transcriptintro.asp
(Note that the transcript does not include questions from the floor).